San Joaquin County pauses new data centers as Nevada fight heats up
An AP report on Nevada’s federal-land data centers lands close to home. San Joaquin freezes approvals while Fresno weighs a ban and Kern projects queue up.
San Joaquin County pauses new data centers as Nevada fight heats up
Key Takeaways
- AP reports Nevada’s governor race is consumed by AI data centers on federal land.
- San Joaquin County approved a 45-day moratorium on new data center land approvals on Oct. 7.
- Fresno leaders have discussed a 10-year citywide ban and say current zoning already blocks data centers.
- Kern County has large proposals, including a 99 MW site and a 275 MW campus near Bakersfield.
The clock started at 45 days. That is how long San Joaquin County is giving itself to catch its breath on data centers, after supervisors voted Oct. 7 to freeze new land approvals while staff studies power, water and siting.
The pause landed the same week the Associated Press reported that AI data center plans on federal land have turned into a headline issue in Nevada’s governor race. For Central Valley readers, the fight matters because developers, utilities and local boards here are already deciding where this stuff goes and who pays for the power upgrades.
What Nevada is fighting over
AP’s report centers on the Townsite project near Boulder City, described as the first data center approved on federal public land before a judge halted construction over reliance on an older environmental review. Nevada has more than a dozen federal-land projects in planning, and 80% of the state is federally owned, which has pushed the issue into campaign ads and stump speeches.
Industry voices quoted by AP say they want to be part of “responsible development” on public lands, but residents near proposed sites are pressing noise, water and viewshed concerns. That mix travels.
What local officials are doing
San Joaquin’s moratorium is narrow, 45 days to start, but it signals the board wants clear answers on load, cooling and siting standards before anything new moves. For now, a pause.
In Fresno, councilmembers have discussed a 10-year citywide prohibition while staff notes that, as of today, city zoning does not allow data centers at all, including in the South Economic Development Area. Separately, Stockton leaders stripped “data centers” from an economic plan after residents raised similar questions.
Stockton still hosts Nautilus Data Technologies, a long-running waterfront facility that local officials have pointed to in past briefings when residents asked whether the city already depends on one.
Projects lining up in Kern
Farther south, Kern County has become a test bed. Trade publications and state filings detail a proposed 99 megawatt site, the RB Inyokern project now in front of the California Energy Commission, and a separate plan to build a 275 megawatt campus outside Bakersfield that would lean on behind-the-meter power at an oil field. Timelines and interconnections will dictate whether either pencils out.
The power and water questions
AP and other outlets have sketched the scale plainly: single campuses can sprawl to the size of dozens of football fields, and a typical modern facility can draw as much electricity as tens of thousands of homes. Those numbers explain why county boards want load studies in hand before greenlighting permits.
What happens in Nevada will not set rules here, but it will shape expectations. Developers read tea leaves across state lines, and so do ratepayers who watch their bills. The San Joaquin vote arrived with little fanfare and one half-empty Diet Coke on the dais.
Central Valley AI is produced by the CVAI Newsdesk team and developed by Kaweah Tech, a regional firm that builds, deploys, and integrates AI solutions for businesses across California's Central Valley.