[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":454},["ShallowReactive",2],{"header":3,"footer":32,"footer-cities":56,"content-\u002Fnews\u002Fattorney-for-maine-client-faces-sanctions-for-ai-driven-errors-in-court-filing":237},{"id":4,"title":5,"body":6,"description":10,"extension":13,"links":14,"meta":26,"navigation":27,"path":28,"seo":29,"stem":30,"__hash__":31},"header\u002Fheader.md","Central Valley AI",{"type":7,"value":8,"toc":9},"minimark",[],{"title":10,"searchDepth":11,"depth":11,"links":12},"",2,[],"md",[15,20],{"label":16,"to":17,"icon":19},"News",{"path":18},"\u002Fnews\u002F","mdi-newspaper-variant-outline",{"label":21,"to":22,"icon":25},"Contact",{"path":23,"hash":24},"\u002F","#contact","mdi-email-outline",{},true,"\u002Fheader",{"title":5,"description":10},"header","CcnlvU-MIELm1QjRt6-8EIWzffq9TShbzfGuB7P8caE",{"id":33,"title":34,"body":35,"copyright":39,"description":10,"developedBy":40,"extension":13,"links":46,"meta":51,"navigation":27,"path":52,"seo":53,"stem":54,"__hash__":55},"footer\u002Ffooter.md","Footer",{"type":7,"value":36,"toc":37},[],{"title":10,"searchDepth":11,"depth":11,"links":38},[],"© {year} All rights reserved.",{"label":41,"link":42},"Developed by",{"label":43,"to":44,"target":45},"Kaweah Tech","https:\u002F\u002Fkaweah.tech","_blank",[47,48],{"label":16,"to":18},{"label":49,"to":50},"Privacy Policy","\u002Fprivacy-policy\u002F",{},"\u002Ffooter",{"description":10},"footer","hsL9eJ4YEacLAdbs9C023GtZ9cLz07zVbmRn545fjvk",[57,87,125,156,183,210],{"id":58,"title":59,"body":60,"county":79,"description":10,"extension":13,"intro":80,"meta":81,"navigation":27,"path":82,"seo":83,"stem":84,"tag":85,"__hash__":86},"cities\u002Fcities\u002Fbakersfield.md","Bakersfield",{"type":7,"value":61,"toc":76},[62,67],[63,64,66],"h2",{"id":65},"ai-in-bakersfield","AI in Bakersfield",[68,69,70,71,75],"p",{},"Bakersfield's AI conversation sits at the intersection of municipal government, the ",[72,73,74],"strong",{},"California State University Bakersfield"," community, and the energy and ag operators that drive Kern County's economy. The city was an early mover on AI-assisted permitting and has been a recurring backdrop for parent- and teacher-led debates about classroom AI use. Articles below follow specific Bakersfield initiatives, public-meeting decisions, and Kern County workforce stories — and how they reflect national AI trends from a regional vantage point.",{"title":10,"searchDepth":11,"depth":11,"links":77},[78],{"id":65,"depth":11,"text":66},"Kern County","Bakersfield and the surrounding Kern County are home to some of the most concrete AI-in-government experiments in the Central Valley, from instant municipal permitting to school-district debates about classroom AI. Coverage on this page tracks how AI is reshaping public services, education, and the energy and agriculture economies that dominate the region.",{},"\u002Fcities\u002Fbakersfield",{"title":59,"description":10},"cities\u002Fbakersfield","bakersfield","ozFL4HvDA_g7UrRE1mHbKqcS-vDLwbiH9JWVh3rB2Ac",{"id":88,"title":89,"body":90,"county":117,"description":10,"extension":13,"intro":118,"meta":119,"navigation":27,"path":120,"seo":121,"stem":122,"tag":123,"__hash__":124},"cities\u002Fcities\u002Ffresno.md","Fresno",{"type":7,"value":91,"toc":114},[92,96,111],[63,93,95],{"id":94},"ai-in-fresno","AI in Fresno",[68,97,98,99,102,103,106,107,110],{},"Fresno's AI story spans several distinct ecosystems. ",[72,100,101],{},"Fresno State"," and the ",[72,104,105],{},"California State University"," system anchor a workforce-readiness push, while local ",[72,108,109],{},"Fresno Unified School District"," debates around responsible use have made the city a recurring reference point in California's K-12 AI conversation. The city's economic base in agriculture, healthcare, and public services means most AI adoption stories here are about applied uses rather than model development — a different posture than coastal tech hubs but arguably more consequential for the people living here.",[68,112,113],{},"Use the articles below to follow how AI is showing up in Fresno-area institutions and businesses.",{"title":10,"searchDepth":11,"depth":11,"links":115},[116],{"id":94,"depth":11,"text":95},"Fresno County","Fresno is the largest city in California's Central Valley and the regional center for AI adoption across agriculture, healthcare, higher education, and small business. Coverage on this page tracks how AI is being applied — and contested — in and around the city of Fresno and Fresno County.",{},"\u002Fcities\u002Ffresno",{"title":89,"description":10},"cities\u002Ffresno","fresno","gOL2xk8y9t9OV6PPxP02OjYhZFHC_Cg-VGijh_V93dI",{"id":126,"title":127,"body":128,"county":148,"description":10,"extension":13,"intro":149,"meta":150,"navigation":27,"path":151,"seo":152,"stem":153,"tag":154,"__hash__":155},"cities\u002Fcities\u002Fmerced.md","Merced",{"type":7,"value":129,"toc":145},[130,134],[63,131,133],{"id":132},"ai-in-merced","AI in Merced",[68,135,136,137,140,141,144],{},"Merced is a research-heavy node in the Central Valley AI ecosystem. ",[72,138,139],{},"UC Merced"," faculty appear in national conversations about AI safety, autonomous vehicles, climate modeling, and pediatric health applications, while the ",[72,142,143],{},"Merced Unified School District"," and surrounding county institutions navigate the same K-12 and workforce questions the rest of the Valley faces. The articles below cover both the campus research story and the broader applied uses around the city and county.",{"title":10,"searchDepth":11,"depth":11,"links":146},[147],{"id":132,"depth":11,"text":133},"Merced County","Merced punches above its weight in AI research, anchored by UC Merced — a leading West Coast hub for AI in agriculture, climate, autonomous systems, and health. Coverage on this page tracks both academic research coming out of the campus and how AI is showing up across Merced's schools, businesses, and county institutions.",{},"\u002Fcities\u002Fmerced",{"title":127,"description":10},"cities\u002Fmerced","merced","pSWWlEzMdcv2_RZrUKdkEHU3bixNboePGdHbSdd1m34",{"id":157,"title":158,"body":159,"county":175,"description":10,"extension":13,"intro":176,"meta":177,"navigation":27,"path":178,"seo":179,"stem":180,"tag":181,"__hash__":182},"cities\u002Fcities\u002Fmodesto.md","Modesto",{"type":7,"value":160,"toc":172},[161,165],[63,162,164],{"id":163},"ai-in-modesto","AI in Modesto",[68,166,167,168,171],{},"Modesto's AI conversation tends to combine ag-tech adoption stories with workforce-readiness questions for the city's small and mid-sized employers. ",[72,169,170],{},"CSU Stanislaus"," and the regional community college network shape the higher-ed angle. Coverage below follows Modesto-area AI announcements and the wider Stanislaus County context.",{"title":10,"searchDepth":11,"depth":11,"links":173},[174],{"id":163,"depth":11,"text":164},"Stanislaus County","Modesto and Stanislaus County sit between the Bay Area and the southern Valley, and their AI story reflects that bridging role — from agriculture and food processing to the **California State University Stanislaus** community to small businesses adapting to AI-driven changes in marketing, hiring, and operations.",{},"\u002Fcities\u002Fmodesto",{"title":158,"description":10},"cities\u002Fmodesto","modesto","l75Dc40MX8wTb4lD088Yx9we4ypuDwmcvE-uEdqqREc",{"id":184,"title":185,"body":186,"county":202,"description":10,"extension":13,"intro":203,"meta":204,"navigation":27,"path":205,"seo":206,"stem":207,"tag":208,"__hash__":209},"cities\u002Fcities\u002Fstockton.md","Stockton",{"type":7,"value":187,"toc":199},[188,192],[63,189,191],{"id":190},"ai-in-stockton","AI in Stockton",[68,193,194,195,198],{},"Stockton's economic base in logistics, healthcare, and higher education gives the city a different AI profile than the southern Valley. ",[72,196,197],{},"University of the Pacific"," anchors the academic conversation, while San Joaquin County government, hospitals, and warehouse operators are navigating practical adoption questions: cost, training, security, workforce impact. The articles below track Stockton-area AI announcements and the broader San Joaquin County context.",{"title":10,"searchDepth":11,"depth":11,"links":200},[201],{"id":190,"depth":11,"text":191},"San Joaquin County","Stockton and San Joaquin County sit at the northern edge of the Central Valley, where logistics, healthcare, and the University of the Pacific shape the local AI adoption story. Coverage on this page follows how AI is being put to work — and questioned — across San Joaquin County's institutions, employers, and public services.",{},"\u002Fcities\u002Fstockton",{"title":185,"description":10},"cities\u002Fstockton","stockton","TYEBK9akp2HbpAFmYY67FeKt7Rs7L8tvtYeQBtgJAHw",{"id":211,"title":212,"body":213,"county":229,"description":10,"extension":13,"intro":230,"meta":231,"navigation":27,"path":232,"seo":233,"stem":234,"tag":235,"__hash__":236},"cities\u002Fcities\u002Fvisalia.md","Visalia",{"type":7,"value":214,"toc":226},[215,219],[63,216,218],{"id":217},"ai-in-visalia","AI in Visalia",[68,220,221,222,225],{},"Visalia's AI footprint is grounded in the practical adoption stories that come with a Tulare County economy built around agriculture, food processing, and rural healthcare. ",[72,223,224],{},"College of the Sequoias"," and the surrounding K-12 districts anchor the education conversation. The articles below cover Visalia-area AI developments and the Tulare County context, with a focus on applied uses rather than research or model development.",{"title":10,"searchDepth":11,"depth":11,"links":227},[228],{"id":217,"depth":11,"text":218},"Tulare County","Visalia is the largest city in Tulare County and a center for agriculture, healthcare, and county-government services in the southern Central Valley. Coverage on this page tracks how AI is being adopted across Tulare County's schools, hospitals, ag operations, and small business community.",{},"\u002Fcities\u002Fvisalia",{"title":212,"description":10},"cities\u002Fvisalia","visalia","gN4g7aAl-cqD4FfSTgtTAarltUoKLh8NFlPzCbZngqU",{"id":238,"title":239,"archived":240,"author":241,"body":242,"date":441,"dateModified":441,"description":442,"extension":13,"meta":443,"navigation":27,"path":444,"rawbody":445,"seo":446,"sitemap":447,"stem":448,"tags":449,"__hash__":453},"news\u002Fnews\u002Fattorney-for-maine-client-faces-sanctions-for-ai-driven-errors-in-court-filing.md","Attorney for Maine Client Faces Sanctions for AI-Driven Errors in Court Filing",false,"CVAI Newsdesk",{"type":7,"value":243,"toc":432},[244,248,252,275,282,286,289,300,303,309,313,320,323,336,340,358,361,364,368,375,382,385,389,401,404,419,422,426],[245,246,239],"h1",{"id":247},"attorney-for-maine-client-faces-sanctions-for-ai-driven-errors-in-court-filing",[63,249,251],{"id":250},"a-court-rebuke-over-ai-generated-legal-mistakes","A court rebuke over AI-generated legal mistakes",[68,253,254,255,258,259,262,263,266,267,270,271,274],{},"A federal judge in Maine has sanctioned ",[72,256,257],{},"attorney Kelly Guagenty",", who represents a former student suing ",[72,260,261],{},"Hyde School"," in Bath, after court filings in the case included inaccurate and fabricated legal citations linked to the use of generative AI tools. The underlying lawsuit accuses the boarding school and related defendants of misconduct including ",[72,264,265],{},"forced labor",", ",[72,268,269],{},"human trafficking",", and ",[72,272,273],{},"negligence",", but the immediate focus shifted to the reliability of the plaintiff’s legal briefing and the responsibilities of counsel when using AI in litigation.",[68,276,277,278,281],{},"Judge ",[72,279,280],{},"Stacey D. Neumann"," concluded that the filings contained serious citation problems and that the errors were significant enough to warrant sanctions, though not monetary penalties. Guagenty was allowed to remain on the case, but the ruling made clear that technology does not lessen a lawyer’s obligation to verify every legal authority presented to a court.",[63,283,285],{"id":284},"what-went-wrong-in-the-filings","What went wrong in the filings",[68,287,288],{},"The disputed filing was submitted in response to a motion seeking dismissal of the lawsuit. In that response, Guagenty cited federal cases and legal authorities that did not accurately support the arguments being made, and some quotations and references could not be verified. A later attempt to fix the problems through an errata filing introduced additional inaccuracies rather than resolving the court’s concerns.",[68,290,291,292,295,296,299],{},"As the issue unfolded, Guagenty eventually acknowledged that the errors stemmed from an AI-assisted drafting process involving either ",[72,293,294],{},"ChatGPT"," or ",[72,297,298],{},"Claude",". She said she had failed to conduct a careful, line-by-line review of the work before it was filed. That admission came only after the court issued a show-cause order asking why sanctions should not be imposed.",[68,301,302],{},"The judge treated that sequence as important. The problem was not simply that AI had been used, but that the resulting authorities were not independently checked before being presented as valid legal support.",[304,305,306],"blockquote",{},[68,307,308],{},"“Although AI can be a useful aid in research and drafting, its use does not diminish an attorney’s nondelegable duties.”",[63,310,312],{"id":311},"the-sanctions-and-the-judges-reasoning","The sanctions and the judge’s reasoning",[68,314,315,316,319],{},"Rather than imposing a fine, the court opted for ",[72,317,318],{},"non-monetary sanctions"," aimed at deterrence and professional correction. Guagenty was ordered to complete continuing legal education related to generative AI, create clearer internal procedures at her law firm to prevent similar failures, provide the sanctions order to her client, and certify to the court that she had complied.",[68,321,322],{},"The court also struck the flawed opposition filing from the docket and required the plaintiff to submit an amended response to the motion to dismiss. That means the larger case against Hyde School is still alive, but the plaintiff’s side must now refile its arguments without the defective citations.",[68,324,325,326,266,329,270,332,335],{},"Judge Neumann’s order emphasized that AI is not inherently improper in legal practice. What matters, in the court’s view, is ",[72,327,328],{},"human verification",[72,330,331],{},"candor",[72,333,334],{},"professional judgment",". The ruling described the risks of unverified AI output as broader than a single bad filing: opposing counsel must spend time uncovering errors, courts must divert attention to policing invented authorities, and public confidence in the legal system can be damaged when false citations appear in official pleadings.",[63,337,339],{"id":338},"the-people-and-institutions-involved","The people and institutions involved",[68,341,342,343,346,347,349,350,353,354,357],{},"The case centers on a lawsuit brought by ",[72,344,345],{},"Jessica Fuller",", a former student, against ",[72,348,261],{},", a well-known boarding school in ",[72,351,352],{},"Bath, Maine",". Guagenty, a Massachusetts attorney, had initially been able to appear in the case with the support of Maine-based attorney ",[72,355,356],{},"John Steed",", who later withdrew after the citation issues surfaced. Guagenty later secured new local counsel and told the court she had taken steps to improve oversight within her firm.",[68,359,360],{},"The judge also noted mitigating factors. Guagenty accepted responsibility, expressed remorse, and did not have a prior disciplinary record. Those factors appear to have helped her avoid a harsher penalty such as monetary sanctions or removal from the case.",[68,362,363],{},"Guagenty said the court’s decision was fair under the circumstances and indicated that she would comply with the order while continuing to represent her client.",[63,365,367],{"id":366},"why-the-case-matters-for-technology-and-ai","Why the case matters for technology and AI",[68,369,370,371,374],{},"The dispute reflects a larger shift in the legal profession as ",[72,372,373],{},"generative AI"," becomes more common in drafting, research, and document preparation. Courts increasingly recognize that these systems can produce text that looks authoritative while containing invented cases, inaccurate quotations, or unsupported legal claims. In high-stakes settings like litigation, that makes unsupervised or poorly supervised AI use especially risky.",[68,376,377,378,381],{},"For the technology sector, the ruling is another example of how adoption is colliding with accountability. The key lesson is not that legal professionals cannot use AI, but that AI outputs must be treated as ",[72,379,380],{},"unverified drafts",", not reliable authority. The burden remains on the attorney whose name is on the filing.",[68,383,384],{},"That lesson extends beyond law firms. Any profession using generative tools for specialized work, including education, healthcare, compliance, and public administration, faces the same basic challenge: automation can accelerate drafting, but it cannot replace responsibility for accuracy.",[63,386,388],{"id":387},"broader-relevance-beyond-maine","Broader relevance beyond Maine",[68,390,391,392,266,394,266,396,270,398,400],{},"There is no direct connection to California’s Central Valley in the dispute itself, but the warning is broadly relevant to courts, law firms, schools, and public institutions across the region. As organizations in places such as ",[72,393,89],{},[72,395,59],{},[72,397,158],{},[72,399,127],{}," adopt AI tools for research and writing, the case underscores a practical point that applies everywhere: efficiency gains mean little if the underlying material is wrong.",[68,402,403],{},"For Central Valley institutions, the significance lies in governance. The ruling reinforces the need for internal review rules, staff training, and disclosure practices whenever generative systems are used in important filings or formal documents. In that sense, the case is part of a wider national test of how traditional professional standards will be enforced in an AI-assisted workplace.",[68,405,406],{},[407,408,409,410,412,413,418],"em",{},"Central Valley AI is produced by the ",[72,411,241],{}," team and developed by ",[414,415,43],"a",{"href":44,"rel":416},[417],"nofollow",", a regional firm that builds, deploys, and integrates AI solutions for businesses across California's Central Valley.",[420,421],"hr",{},[63,423,425],{"id":424},"source","Source",[68,427,428],{},[414,429,430],{"href":430,"rel":431},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.newscentermaine.com\u002Farticle\u002Fnews\u002Flocal\u002Fcourts-news\u002Fattorney-for-maine-client-faces-sanctions-for-ai-driven-errors-in-court-filing\u002F97-6699d6d9-c7e2-49a2-b1ca-004a170592fb",[417],{"title":10,"searchDepth":11,"depth":11,"links":433},[434,435,436,437,438,439,440],{"id":250,"depth":11,"text":251},{"id":284,"depth":11,"text":285},{"id":311,"depth":11,"text":312},{"id":338,"depth":11,"text":339},{"id":366,"depth":11,"text":367},{"id":387,"depth":11,"text":388},{"id":424,"depth":11,"text":425},"2026-05-09","A federal judge in Maine sanctioned an attorney representing a former Hyde School student after AI-assisted drafting introduced fabricated and inaccurate legal citations into court filings, highlighting growing scrutiny of generative tools in legal practice.",{},"\u002Fnews\u002Fattorney-for-maine-client-faces-sanctions-for-ai-driven-errors-in-court-filing","---\ntitle: \"Attorney for Maine Client Faces Sanctions for AI-Driven Errors in Court Filing\"\ndescription: \"A federal judge in Maine sanctioned an attorney representing a former Hyde School student after AI-assisted drafting introduced fabricated and inaccurate legal citations into court filings, highlighting growing scrutiny of generative tools in legal practice.\"\ndate: 2026-05-09\ntags:\n  - law\n  - courts\n  - technology\nauthor: \"CVAI Newsdesk\"\ndateModified: \"2026-05-09\"\n---\n\n# Attorney for Maine Client Faces Sanctions for AI-Driven Errors in Court Filing\n\n## A court rebuke over AI-generated legal mistakes\n\nA federal judge in Maine has sanctioned **attorney Kelly Guagenty**, who represents a former student suing **Hyde School** in Bath, after court filings in the case included inaccurate and fabricated legal citations linked to the use of generative AI tools. The underlying lawsuit accuses the boarding school and related defendants of misconduct including **forced labor**, **human trafficking**, and **negligence**, but the immediate focus shifted to the reliability of the plaintiff’s legal briefing and the responsibilities of counsel when using AI in litigation.\n\nJudge **Stacey D. Neumann** concluded that the filings contained serious citation problems and that the errors were significant enough to warrant sanctions, though not monetary penalties. Guagenty was allowed to remain on the case, but the ruling made clear that technology does not lessen a lawyer’s obligation to verify every legal authority presented to a court.\n\n## What went wrong in the filings\n\nThe disputed filing was submitted in response to a motion seeking dismissal of the lawsuit. In that response, Guagenty cited federal cases and legal authorities that did not accurately support the arguments being made, and some quotations and references could not be verified. A later attempt to fix the problems through an errata filing introduced additional inaccuracies rather than resolving the court’s concerns.\n\nAs the issue unfolded, Guagenty eventually acknowledged that the errors stemmed from an AI-assisted drafting process involving either **ChatGPT** or **Claude**. She said she had failed to conduct a careful, line-by-line review of the work before it was filed. That admission came only after the court issued a show-cause order asking why sanctions should not be imposed.\n\nThe judge treated that sequence as important. The problem was not simply that AI had been used, but that the resulting authorities were not independently checked before being presented as valid legal support.\n\n> “Although AI can be a useful aid in research and drafting, its use does not diminish an attorney’s nondelegable duties.”\n\n## The sanctions and the judge’s reasoning\n\nRather than imposing a fine, the court opted for **non-monetary sanctions** aimed at deterrence and professional correction. Guagenty was ordered to complete continuing legal education related to generative AI, create clearer internal procedures at her law firm to prevent similar failures, provide the sanctions order to her client, and certify to the court that she had complied.\n\nThe court also struck the flawed opposition filing from the docket and required the plaintiff to submit an amended response to the motion to dismiss. That means the larger case against Hyde School is still alive, but the plaintiff’s side must now refile its arguments without the defective citations.\n\nJudge Neumann’s order emphasized that AI is not inherently improper in legal practice. What matters, in the court’s view, is **human verification**, **candor**, and **professional judgment**. The ruling described the risks of unverified AI output as broader than a single bad filing: opposing counsel must spend time uncovering errors, courts must divert attention to policing invented authorities, and public confidence in the legal system can be damaged when false citations appear in official pleadings.\n\n## The people and institutions involved\n\nThe case centers on a lawsuit brought by **Jessica Fuller**, a former student, against **Hyde School**, a well-known boarding school in **Bath, Maine**. Guagenty, a Massachusetts attorney, had initially been able to appear in the case with the support of Maine-based attorney **John Steed**, who later withdrew after the citation issues surfaced. Guagenty later secured new local counsel and told the court she had taken steps to improve oversight within her firm.\n\nThe judge also noted mitigating factors. Guagenty accepted responsibility, expressed remorse, and did not have a prior disciplinary record. Those factors appear to have helped her avoid a harsher penalty such as monetary sanctions or removal from the case.\n\nGuagenty said the court’s decision was fair under the circumstances and indicated that she would comply with the order while continuing to represent her client.\n\n## Why the case matters for technology and AI\n\nThe dispute reflects a larger shift in the legal profession as **generative AI** becomes more common in drafting, research, and document preparation. Courts increasingly recognize that these systems can produce text that looks authoritative while containing invented cases, inaccurate quotations, or unsupported legal claims. In high-stakes settings like litigation, that makes unsupervised or poorly supervised AI use especially risky.\n\nFor the technology sector, the ruling is another example of how adoption is colliding with accountability. The key lesson is not that legal professionals cannot use AI, but that AI outputs must be treated as **unverified drafts**, not reliable authority. The burden remains on the attorney whose name is on the filing.\n\nThat lesson extends beyond law firms. Any profession using generative tools for specialized work, including education, healthcare, compliance, and public administration, faces the same basic challenge: automation can accelerate drafting, but it cannot replace responsibility for accuracy.\n\n## Broader relevance beyond Maine\n\nThere is no direct connection to California’s Central Valley in the dispute itself, but the warning is broadly relevant to courts, law firms, schools, and public institutions across the region. As organizations in places such as **Fresno**, **Bakersfield**, **Modesto**, and **Merced** adopt AI tools for research and writing, the case underscores a practical point that applies everywhere: efficiency gains mean little if the underlying material is wrong.\n\nFor Central Valley institutions, the significance lies in governance. The ruling reinforces the need for internal review rules, staff training, and disclosure practices whenever generative systems are used in important filings or formal documents. In that sense, the case is part of a wider national test of how traditional professional standards will be enforced in an AI-assisted workplace.\n\n*Central Valley AI is produced by the **CVAI Newsdesk** team and developed by [Kaweah Tech](https:\u002F\u002Fkaweah.tech), a regional firm that builds, deploys, and integrates AI solutions for businesses across California's Central Valley.*\n\n---\n\n## Source\n\nhttps:\u002F\u002Fwww.newscentermaine.com\u002Farticle\u002Fnews\u002Flocal\u002Fcourts-news\u002Fattorney-for-maine-client-faces-sanctions-for-ai-driven-errors-in-court-filing\u002F97-6699d6d9-c7e2-49a2-b1ca-004a170592fb\n",{"title":239,"description":442},{"loc":444},"news\u002Fattorney-for-maine-client-faces-sanctions-for-ai-driven-errors-in-court-filing",[450,451,452],"law","courts","technology","JyH98uhMba3qT1zuR_ApAxr7wZWTQoXWY6Sp78nIAVY",1779739135077]